Galidix (galidix.com) Scam Investigation: Regulators Across Europe Warn Investors

AssetVault Recovery’s finding: investors should not send money to Galidix or galidix.com. Our investigation found a regulatory trail stretching across several European jurisdictions, including warnings or intervention involving financial authorities in Belgium, Sweden, Spain, the United Kingdom, Italy and France.

This is not a case where one regulator has simply questioned whether a little-known trading website holds the correct licence. Sweden’s Finansinspektionen (FI) said its investigation could not determine that Galidix was a real company. Spain’s CNMV said it was not authorised for specified investment and crypto-asset services. The UK’s FCA says the firm is unauthorised, while Italy’s CONSOB ordered access blocked to Galidix websites.

France’s AMF has now added the exact domain galidix.com to its blacklist under crypto-assets derivatives.

If you have already deposited money with Galidix, the priority now is not the profit or account balance shown on its trading dashboard. The important evidence is where your real money was sent.

Do not make another payment simply because you are told a tax, verification charge, withdrawal fee or other payment is necessary to release your balance.

👉 Already paid Galidix? Submit your payment and transaction information for review.

Galidix Has Been on Regulators’ Radar for Months

The history surrounding Galidix is important because the French warning is not the beginning of the story.

Belgium’s FSMA included Galidix among trading platforms it warned consumers against, identifying galidix.com and trading-area.galidix-v5.com. The warning formed part of the regulator’s wider action against fraudulent trading platforms.

Then, on March 27, 2026, Sweden’s Finansinspektionen (FI) published an investor alert after becoming aware that people claiming to represent Galidix were offering securities trading to Swedish investors.

The Swedish finding goes beyond simply saying that Galidix lacked a Swedish licence. Finansinspektionen (FI) said it had investigated the matter and had been unable to determine that Galidix was a real company. It also said Galidix was not authorised by the regulator, was not under its supervision and had no cross-border activity notified from another EEA country.

That finding deserves particular attention from anyone who was persuaded to trust Galidix because of addresses, account managers or an apparently professional trading interface.

Spain Found Galidix Was Not Authorised for Investment or Crypto Services

Spain’s CNMV issued its own warning on April 20, 2026.

The Spanish regulator identified both galidix.com and trading-area.galidix-v3.com. According to the warning, Galidix was not authorised to provide regulated investment services and activities covered by Spanish securities law, including relevant foreign-currency transactions.

The CNMV also specifically stated that Galidix was not authorised to conduct activities reserved for crypto-asset service providers under the EU Markets in Crypto-Assets framework.

For investors, that is much more meaningful than a website simply describing itself as a trading business. Regulatory permission has to be independently verifiable.

The London Address Did Not Mean Galidix Was FCA Authorised

Galidix used an address at 27 Bush Lane, London EC4R 0AA, as well as an address at 18 Ah Hood Road, Singapore. Those same details appeared in regulatory warnings.

On July 15, 2026, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) warned that Galidix may be providing or promoting financial services or products without permission.

The FCA explicitly states that the firm is not authorised and may be targeting people in the UK. It also warns that consumers dealing with the firm would not have access to the Financial Ombudsman Service and would not receive Financial Services Compensation Scheme protection if things went wrong.

This is similar to a pattern AssetVault examined in our Firm Apex Trades investigation: a location or professional-looking corporate presentation should never be confused with independently verified regulatory authorisation.

Italy Went Further and Ordered the Galidix Websites Blocked

Italy’s intervention was particularly significant.

On August 5, 2026, CONSOB adopted Resolution No. 24104 concerning Galidix. The regulator ordered internet service providers to block access from Italy to galidix.com and the associated page trading-area.galidix-v2.com.

The action concerned the unlawful provision of investment services through the websites.

There is also an interesting infrastructure pattern. Different regulatory records identify:

• trading-area.galidix-v5.com — Belgian warning
• trading-area.galidix-v3.com — Spanish warning
• trading-area.galidix-v2.com — Italian action

Those records establish that multiple Galidix-branded trading-area subdomains existed. They should not be treated as unrelated websites simply because their version numbers differ.

France’s AMF Adds galidix.com to Its Blacklist

The regulatory trail continued in September.

On September 4, 2026, France’s Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) added galidix.com to its blacklist under Crypto-assets derivatives.

The significance here is cumulative. Someone researching Galidix today is not looking at one isolated warning. The same core domain has surfaced repeatedly before European financial authorities over a period of months.

This kind of regulatory escalation is also why investors should check beyond whatever licence or company information appears on a trading website itself. Our investigations into Intrade24 and Vinvory Capital similarly show why warnings from multiple jurisdictions can provide a much clearer picture than the platform’s own marketing.

Already Paid Galidix? Ignore the Dashboard and Trace the Money

Public complaints concerning Galidix include allegations of withdrawal difficulties and demands for additional payments. One complaint concerning a Galidix trading-area domain alleged that a withdrawal was delayed using explanations involving identity documentation, a supposed Singapore tax and other requirements.

These are consumer allegations, not regulatory findings, and AssetVault has not independently verified each review. Online reviews can also contain unreliable material, including promotions for questionable recovery services. They should therefore be treated cautiously.

However, anyone personally experiencing a similar pattern should avoid assuming that another payment will automatically unlock their funds.

If you deposited cryptocurrency, preserve the transaction hash, receiving wallet address, cryptocurrency and blockchain network. If you paid through a bank, preserve the beneficiary name, account details, transfer references and receipts.

Also save emails, telephone numbers, WhatsApp or Telegram conversations, screenshots, withdrawal requests and every instruction telling you where to send money.

The principle discussed in our Intrade24 investigation applies directly here: follow the actual transaction trail, not the balance displayed inside the trading account.

A screen showing €50,000, €100,000 or more does not establish that those funds exist or are held in an account for you. What can be independently examined is the movement of the money you actually transferred.

AssetVault’s Assessment of Galidix

The evidence against Galidix is unusually extensive.

Belgium’s FSMA warned against Galidix. Sweden’s Finansinspektionen (FI) said it could not determine that Galidix was a real company. Spain’s CNMV found it unauthorised for specified investment and crypto-asset services. The UK’s FCA says it is unauthorised. Italy’s CONSOB ordered its websites blocked, and France’s AMF has blacklisted galidix.com.

AssetVault Recovery therefore considers galidix.com unsafe and believes the available evidence is consistent with a scam trading operation.

Investors should not send additional funds to Galidix.

Lost Money to Galidix? Here’s the Next Step

If you have already paid Galidix, AssetVault can review the transaction evidence to help establish where the funds actually went. For cryptocurrency transactions, that can include examining wallet addresses, transaction hashes and subsequent blockchain movements. For bank payments, the beneficiary and transfer documentation may help establish the payment route.

Do not delete communications even if the people involved have stopped responding. What appears unimportant today — a wallet address, telephone number, email header or payment instruction — may later help connect transactions and counterparties.

👉 Request a confidential case assessment

👉 Speak directly with our recovery team

👉 Submit your Galidix transaction information for review

No upfront recovery fees. Fees are payable only after a successful recovery.

Disclaimer

This investigation is provided for informational and investor-education purposes. Regulatory statements attributed to Belgium’s FSMA, Sweden’s Finansinspektionen (FI), Spain’s CNMV, the UK’s FCA, Italy’s CONSOB and France’s AMF are distinguished from AssetVault Recovery’s independent assessment. AssetVault Recovery is not a financial regulator, law-enforcement authority or court. References to consumer complaints describe allegations and should not be treated as independently established facts. Case assessment does not guarantee that lost funds can be recovered.