GetLiquid365 Finance Limited (getliquid365.com) Scam Warning: AFM Flags Suspected Boiler Room

Investors should avoid GetLiquid365 Finance Limited and getliquid365.com. The Netherlands’ Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has issued a warning against the operation and identified it as a suspected boiler room—a form of online investment fraud.

The warning, published on September 15, 2026, identifies the exact website getliquid365.com, along with addresses in Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. The warning has also been reported through IOSCO’s International Securities & Commodities Alerts Network (I-SCAN), giving the regulatory alert international visibility.

AssetVault Recovery’s review found additional reasons for serious concern. GetLiquid365 describes itself as a “regulated and secure” trading platform and a “trusted global broker.” Yet pages on getliquid365.com repeatedly identify the business as Getliquid24 instead. Even more significantly, Getliquid24 itself was previously identified by the AFM as a suspected boiler room.

AssetVault Recovery considers getliquid365.com unsafe. The regulatory evidence, the earlier Getliquid24 warning and the unexplained overlap between the two identities are consistent with a scam investment operation.

👉 Already paid GetLiquid365? Submit your transaction information for review and recovery options.

The AFM Says GetLiquid365 Finance Limited Is a Suspected Boiler Room

The AFM warning leaves little ambiguity about which operation is involved.

The regulator identifies the business as Getliquid365 Finance Limited and lists:

• Domain: getliquid365.com
• Telephone: +44 (330) 027 3910
• Emails: partners@getliquid365.net and support@getliquid365.net
• Germany: Kurfürstendamm 15, 10719 Berlin
• Switzerland: Bahnhofstrasse 37, 8001 Zürich
• United Kingdom: Plough Way, Southwark, London, SE16 7DW

The AFM advises consumers not to respond to offers from GetLiquid365 Finance Limited because it suspects the business is a boiler room. The regulator describes this type of operation as a form of online investment fraud.

That distinction matters. This is stronger than a regulator simply stating that it cannot find a licence. The AFM has attached an explicit suspected-fraud classification to the operation.

The warning has also entered IOSCO I-SCAN. This means investors and regulators internationally can encounter the warning through the global alerts network. It should not, however, be misrepresented as a second independent enforcement action: the underlying regulatory finding comes from the AFM.

GetLiquid365 Calls Itself a “Regulated and Secure” Broker

What GetLiquid365 says about itself makes the regulatory warning particularly important.

On getliquid365.com, the platform describes itself as a “regulated and secure” provider of crypto, investing and CFD trading. It promotes access to forex, stocks, indices, commodities, precious metals and cryptocurrencies.

The website also says the business has been operating since 2024 and promotes itself as a reliable global broker. Prospective customers are offered dedicated account managers, trading signals, automated trading, multiple funding methods and leverage of up to 1:1000.

Its footer says the trading platform and educational content are provided by Getliquid365 Ltd, which it identifies as “Getliquid365 Finance Limited.” It also states that the company provides investment advice, recommendations and trading strategies and facilitates purchases and sales involving securities, derivatives and futures contracts.

Those are substantial financial-service claims.

Yet the exact business and website making them are now the subject of a suspected-boiler-room warning from the AFM.

Calling a platform “regulated” does not establish regulation. A legitimate regulatory claim should be independently verifiable through the relevant authority, under the exact legal entity providing the service.

Why Does GetLiquid365 Keep Calling Itself Getliquid24?

This is one of the most significant findings in AssetVault’s independent review.

Although the website is branded GetLiquid365, its own pages repeatedly use another name: Getliquid24.

On the About Us page, visitors are told that “Getliquid24” is a global leader in financial and investment services. The trading-platform section refers to “The Getliquid24 Platforms.” Product pages instruct customers to open a Getliquid24 account, while the VPS section discusses deposits and trading activity in a Getliquid24 account.

This is too extensive to dismiss as a single typographical mistake.

And Getliquid24 is not an insignificant name.

On June 23, 2026, the AFM issued a separate warning against Getliquid24, identifying it as another suspected boiler room.

That earlier warning identified:

• Name: Getliquid24
• Domain: getliquid24.com
• Telephone: +44 (330) 027 3910
• Email: support@getliquid24.net

The telephone number in that earlier warning—+44 (330) 027 3910—is the same telephone number now identified by the AFM for GetLiquid365 Finance Limited.

This is a critical connection.

We are therefore not looking merely at two businesses with vaguely similar names. The current GetLiquid365 website repeatedly calls itself Getliquid24, and the two AFM warnings identify the same telephone number.

The Getliquid24 Connection Changes the Risk Assessment

Seen separately, the inconsistent branding on getliquid365.com could perhaps be explained as careless website development or recycled content.

Seen alongside the regulatory record, that explanation becomes much harder to accept without evidence.

The chronology is striking. The AFM warned against Getliquid24 on June 23, 2026. GetLiquid365 now operates a website whose pages still repeatedly describe the platform as Getliquid24. The same telephone number appears in both AFM warnings. Then, on September 15, the AFM separately warned against GetLiquid365 Finance Limited.

AssetVault cannot determine from those facts alone precisely who controls both operations. But the overlap is material and should not be ignored by anyone considering depositing funds.

Similar identity questions have featured in previous AssetVault investigations. Our BVF Capital investigation showed why names, addresses and corporate-looking information should always be verified independently rather than accepted because they appear on a professional website.

Berlin, Zürich and London Addresses Do Not Prove Regulation

GetLiquid365’s international presentation may also give prospective investors an impression of an established cross-border financial company.

The addresses identified by the AFM place the operation in three major European financial centres: Berlin, Zürich and London.

But an address is not a financial licence.

Investors should never assume that a company displaying a London address is therefore authorised by the UK’s financial regulator, or that a Zürich address demonstrates Swiss regulatory supervision. The same applies to Germany.

This distinction has repeatedly mattered in online trading investigations. In our Firm Apex Trades investigation, AssetVault examined why professional branding and apparent corporate details could not substitute for independently verifiable regulatory status.

GetLiquid365’s own website makes strong claims about being regulated, secure and trustworthy. Those claims should be evaluated against the regulatory warning attached to the exact domain—not against the sophistication of its web design or the prestige associated with the cities listed on its contact page.

High Leverage and “Fast Withdrawals” Are Part of the Sales Pitch

GetLiquid365 encourages customers to trade a wide range of CFDs and promotes leverage of up to 1:1000. Some product pages tell prospective traders they can start with as little as $250.

The site also advertises “Instant Deposit” and “Fast Withdrawal.”

For anyone who has already deposited, the important question is whether withdrawals actually reach the customer’s own bank account or cryptocurrency wallet—not whether an internal account page says a withdrawal is available.

AssetVault has seen this distinction repeatedly when investigating online trading operations. In our Intrade24 investigation, we explained why the genuine transaction trail becomes more important than profits or balances displayed inside a trading interface.

A platform can display a profitable position, account balance or supposed investment return. That figure does not independently establish that corresponding assets are held for the customer or that the displayed amount can actually be withdrawn.

Already Paid GetLiquid365? Do Not Send Another “Release” Payment

If you have already transferred money to GetLiquid365, do not panic—but do not send additional funds merely because an account manager says another payment is necessary.

Be especially cautious if a withdrawal is made conditional on paying a:

• withdrawal fee;
• tax or capital-gains payment;
• AML or compliance charge;
• account verification fee;
• insurance payment;
• liquidity charge;
• blockchain or wallet fee;
• commission before funds can be released; or
• additional deposit to reach a required account level.

A demand for more money should be preserved as evidence rather than automatically paid.

Keep emails, telephone numbers, WhatsApp or Telegram conversations, screenshots of the trading account, withdrawal requests and any documents sent by the supposed broker.

For cryptocurrency deposits, preserve the transaction hash, receiving wallet address, cryptocurrency and blockchain network. For bank payments, retain the beneficiary name, account information, transfer reference and payment confirmation.

As discussed in our Vinvory Capital investigation, following the actual movement of money can reveal information that the platform’s own account interface cannot.

AssetVault’s Assessment: GetLiquid365 Should Be Treated as a Scam Risk

The evidence surrounding GetLiquid365 Finance Limited goes beyond a website with questionable marketing.

The AFM has explicitly warned consumers not to respond to the company because it suspects the operation is a boiler room—a form of online investment fraud.

Meanwhile, getliquid365.com calls itself a regulated and secure broker while repeatedly identifying its own services as Getliquid24. That name was already the subject of a separate AFM suspected-boiler-room warning months earlier.

Most importantly, the telephone number identified for Getliquid24 in the June warning is the same number the regulator now associates with GetLiquid365 Finance Limited.

Those connections materially strengthen the risk assessment.

AssetVault Recovery considers GetLiquid365 Finance Limited and getliquid365.com unsafe and believes the available evidence is consistent with a scam investment operation. Investors should not send money to the platform.

Lost Money to GetLiquid365? Follow the Payment Trail

If you already invested through getliquid365.com, the amount shown on your trading dashboard should not be treated as proof of what can actually be recovered.

The useful starting point is the money that genuinely left your control.

AssetVault can review cryptocurrency transaction hashes and wallet addresses to examine how digital assets moved after payment. Bank-transfer documentation can help identify receiving accounts and beneficiaries. Communications and payment instructions can then be compared with that transaction evidence.

The objective is to establish where the money went—not simply what GetLiquid365 says the account is worth.

👉 Request a confidential case assessment

👉 Speak directly with our recovery team

👉 Submit your GetLiquid365 transaction information for review

No upfront recovery fees. Fees are payable only after a successful recovery.

Disclaimer

This investigation is provided for informational and investor-education purposes. The suspected-boiler-room classifications discussed above are findings published by the Netherlands’ Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). References to IOSCO concern the international circulation of regulatory warning information and should not be interpreted as a separate enforcement finding unless expressly stated by IOSCO. AssetVault Recovery’s conclusions represent its independent assessment of the available evidence. AssetVault Recovery is not a financial regulator, law-enforcement agency or court, and nothing in this article constitutes financial or legal advice. Case assessment does not guarantee recovery of lost funds.